Hitachi vs EMC SAN for SQL

Hello,
I wanted to know of any pros and cons you may have faced or heard of using
either the Hitachi or EMC SAN.
We may consider the high end Hitachi USP1100, but wanted to know if any of
you may have used it and had any negative experiences. We intend to use it
for our high online transactional systems and also use the features to do
storage replication,etc.
Please share some of your stories..good and/or bad.
Thanks
Hi Hassan
"Hassan" wrote:

> Hello,
> I wanted to know of any pros and cons you may have faced or heard of using
> either the Hitachi or EMC SAN.
> We may consider the high end Hitachi USP1100, but wanted to know if any of
> you may have used it and had any negative experiences. We intend to use it
> for our high online transactional systems and also use the features to do
> storage replication,etc.
> Please share some of your stories..good and/or bad.
> Thanks
This tends to be a moving target, what is good/bad/better in one changes on
the next release!
John

Hitachi vs EMC SAN for SQL

Hello,
I wanted to know of any pros and cons you may have faced or heard of using
either the Hitachi or EMC SAN.
We may consider the high end Hitachi USP1100, but wanted to know if any of
you may have used it and had any negative experiences. We intend to use it
for our high online transactional systems and also use the features to do
storage replication,etc.
Please share some of your stories..good and/or bad.
ThanksHi Hassan
"Hassan" wrote:

> Hello,
> I wanted to know of any pros and cons you may have faced or heard of using
> either the Hitachi or EMC SAN.
> We may consider the high end Hitachi USP1100, but wanted to know if any of
> you may have used it and had any negative experiences. We intend to use it
> for our high online transactional systems and also use the features to do
> storage replication,etc.
> Please share some of your stories..good and/or bad.
> Thanks
This tends to be a moving target, what is good/bad/better in one changes on
the next release!
John