Showing posts with label san. Show all posts
Showing posts with label san. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Hitachi vs EMC SAN for SQL

Hello,
I wanted to know of any pros and cons you may have faced or heard of using
either the Hitachi or EMC SAN.
We may consider the high end Hitachi USP1100, but wanted to know if any of
you may have used it and had any negative experiences. We intend to use it
for our high online transactional systems and also use the features to do
storage replication,etc.
Please share some of your stories..good and/or bad.
Thanks
Hi Hassan
"Hassan" wrote:

> Hello,
> I wanted to know of any pros and cons you may have faced or heard of using
> either the Hitachi or EMC SAN.
> We may consider the high end Hitachi USP1100, but wanted to know if any of
> you may have used it and had any negative experiences. We intend to use it
> for our high online transactional systems and also use the features to do
> storage replication,etc.
> Please share some of your stories..good and/or bad.
> Thanks
This tends to be a moving target, what is good/bad/better in one changes on
the next release!
John

Hitachi vs EMC SAN for SQL

Hello,
I wanted to know of any pros and cons you may have faced or heard of using
either the Hitachi or EMC SAN.
We may consider the high end Hitachi USP1100, but wanted to know if any of
you may have used it and had any negative experiences. We intend to use it
for our high online transactional systems and also use the features to do
storage replication,etc.
Please share some of your stories..good and/or bad.
ThanksHi Hassan
"Hassan" wrote:

> Hello,
> I wanted to know of any pros and cons you may have faced or heard of using
> either the Hitachi or EMC SAN.
> We may consider the high end Hitachi USP1100, but wanted to know if any of
> you may have used it and had any negative experiences. We intend to use it
> for our high online transactional systems and also use the features to do
> storage replication,etc.
> Please share some of your stories..good and/or bad.
> Thanks
This tends to be a moving target, what is good/bad/better in one changes on
the next release!
John

Hitachi vs EMC SAN for SQL

Hello,
I wanted to know of any pros and cons you may have faced or heard of using
either the Hitachi or EMC SAN.
We may consider the high end Hitachi USP1100, but wanted to know if any of
you may have used it and had any negative experiences. We intend to use it
for our high online transactional systems and also use the features to do
storage replication,etc.
Please share some of your stories..good and/or bad.
ThanksHi Hassan
"Hassan" wrote:
> Hello,
> I wanted to know of any pros and cons you may have faced or heard of using
> either the Hitachi or EMC SAN.
> We may consider the high end Hitachi USP1100, but wanted to know if any of
> you may have used it and had any negative experiences. We intend to use it
> for our high online transactional systems and also use the features to do
> storage replication,etc.
> Please share some of your stories..good and/or bad.
> Thanks
This tends to be a moving target, what is good/bad/better in one changes on
the next release!
John

Monday, March 12, 2012

High Availability Solutions

Can someone list some HA solutions out there ?
Also with regards to HA wrt SAN
Also curious to know how such HA solutions can help when doing planned
downtime such as installing service packs or upgrading code such as altering
a table,etc..Might want to have a look here:
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/technologies/highavailability/default.mspx
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"Just Me" <justme@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:uhgQJ1j7FHA.736@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Can someone list some HA solutions out there ?
> Also with regards to HA wrt SAN
> Also curious to know how such HA solutions can help when doing planned
> downtime such as installing service packs or upgrading code such as
> altering a table,etc..
>