hit locations in full text

I'm working on an aplication that could benefit from having the hit
location inside of a column. For example
A Column has
"United Stated Education System : Educational Stuff"
The full text search might match Education and Edicational from the
word eudcation. But I can not see any clear way to determine what
word(s) were matches and how they were used in the ranking. Is there
any known way to do this?
Thanks,
madmike
No, you have to implement a version of Porter Stemming algorithm to do
something like this.
Hilary Cotter
Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy
RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence.
This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's
positions, strategies or opinions.
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
<madmik3@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1159463316.911169.56710@.e3g2000cwe.googlegrou ps.com...
> I'm working on an aplication that could benefit from having the hit
> location inside of a column. For example
> A Column has
> "United Stated Education System : Educational Stuff"
>
> The full text search might match Education and Edicational from the
> word eudcation. But I can not see any clear way to determine what
> word(s) were matches and how they were used in the ranking. Is there
> any known way to do this?
> Thanks,
> madmike
>

High Availability across different sites

Can someone give me a list of outside vendors that help support High
Availability of SQL across geographically dispersed locations. I know
Veritas, NSI, EMC have some solutions that eliminate the shared disk storage
limitation of clustering.. Thanks.Using SQL 2000Posting to groups again..
Can someone give me a list of outside vendors that help support High
Availability of SQL across geographically dispersed locations. I know
Veritas, NSI, EMC have some solutions that eliminate the shared disk storage
limitation of clustering.. Thanks.Using SQL 2000
"Hassan" <fatima_ja@.hotmail.com> wrote in message news:...
> Can someone give me a list of outside vendors that help support High
> Availability of SQL across geographically dispersed locations. I know
> Veritas, NSI, EMC have some solutions that eliminate the shared disk
storage
> limitation of clustering.. Thanks.Using SQL 2000
>|||I think Hitachi does as well.
Hilary Cotter
Looking for a book on SQL Server replication?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
"Hassan" <fatima_ja@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23XZ9R6faEHA.2516@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Posting to groups again..
> Can someone give me a list of outside vendors that help support High
> Availability of SQL across geographically dispersed locations. I know
> Veritas, NSI, EMC have some solutions that eliminate the shared disk
storage
> limitation of clustering.. Thanks.Using SQL 2000
>
> "Hassan" <fatima_ja@.hotmail.com> wrote in message news:...
> storage
>|||if you go with hardware (EMC or Hitachi), you are usually going with
"synchronous" which will raise the ongoing cost of the solution in bandwidth
and limit the maximum distance apart that the nodes can be.
if you go with NSI, you can go any distance since its asynchronous and as a
software-only soluton, you wont have to buy to expensive Symetrix boxes and
SRDF.
jason
"Hassan" <fatima_ja@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23XZ9R6faEHA.2516@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Posting to groups again..
> Can someone give me a list of outside vendors that help support High
> Availability of SQL across geographically dispersed locations. I know
> Veritas, NSI, EMC have some solutions that eliminate the shared disk
storage
> limitation of clustering.. Thanks.Using SQL 2000
>
> "Hassan" <fatima_ja@.hotmail.com> wrote in message news:...
> storage
>|||...though you would risk lose Microsoft support for your cluster by doing
so.
Regards,
John
"Jason Buffington" <jasonbuffington@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23$I4sjGdEHA.2520@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> if you go with hardware (EMC or Hitachi), you are usually going with
> "synchronous" which will raise the ongoing cost of the solution in
bandwidth
> and limit the maximum distance apart that the nodes can be.
> if you go with NSI, you can go any distance since its asynchronous and as
a
> software-only soluton, you wont have to buy to expensive Symetrix boxes
and
> SRDF.
> jason
>
> "Hassan" <fatima_ja@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:%23XZ9R6faEHA.2516@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> storage
>

High Availability across different sites

Can someone give me a list of outside vendors that help support High
Availability of SQL across geographically dispersed locations. I know
Veritas, NSI, EMC have some solutions that eliminate the shared disk storage
limitation of clustering.. Thanks.Using SQL 2000
Posting to groups again..
Can someone give me a list of outside vendors that help support High
Availability of SQL across geographically dispersed locations. I know
Veritas, NSI, EMC have some solutions that eliminate the shared disk storage
limitation of clustering.. Thanks.Using SQL 2000
"Hassan" <fatima_ja@.hotmail.com> wrote in message news:...
> Can someone give me a list of outside vendors that help support High
> Availability of SQL across geographically dispersed locations. I know
> Veritas, NSI, EMC have some solutions that eliminate the shared disk
storage
> limitation of clustering.. Thanks.Using SQL 2000
>
|||I think Hitachi does as well.
Hilary Cotter
Looking for a book on SQL Server replication?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
"Hassan" <fatima_ja@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23XZ9R6faEHA.2516@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Posting to groups again..
> Can someone give me a list of outside vendors that help support High
> Availability of SQL across geographically dispersed locations. I know
> Veritas, NSI, EMC have some solutions that eliminate the shared disk
storage
> limitation of clustering.. Thanks.Using SQL 2000
>
> "Hassan" <fatima_ja@.hotmail.com> wrote in message news:...
> storage
>
|||if you go with hardware (EMC or Hitachi), you are usually going with
"synchronous" which will raise the ongoing cost of the solution in bandwidth
and limit the maximum distance apart that the nodes can be.
if you go with NSI, you can go any distance since its asynchronous and as a
software-only soluton, you wont have to buy to expensive Symetrix boxes and
SRDF.
jason
"Hassan" <fatima_ja@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23XZ9R6faEHA.2516@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Posting to groups again..
> Can someone give me a list of outside vendors that help support High
> Availability of SQL across geographically dispersed locations. I know
> Veritas, NSI, EMC have some solutions that eliminate the shared disk
storage
> limitation of clustering.. Thanks.Using SQL 2000
>
> "Hassan" <fatima_ja@.hotmail.com> wrote in message news:...
> storage
>
|||...though you would risk lose Microsoft support for your cluster by doing
so.
Regards,
John
"Jason Buffington" <jasonbuffington@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23$I4sjGdEHA.2520@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> if you go with hardware (EMC or Hitachi), you are usually going with
> "synchronous" which will raise the ongoing cost of the solution in
bandwidth
> and limit the maximum distance apart that the nodes can be.
> if you go with NSI, you can go any distance since its asynchronous and as
a
> software-only soluton, you wont have to buy to expensive Symetrix boxes
and
> SRDF.
> jason
>
> "Hassan" <fatima_ja@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:%23XZ9R6faEHA.2516@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> storage
>