Can someone give me a list of outside vendors that help support High
Availability of SQL across geographically dispersed locations. I know
Veritas, NSI, EMC have some solutions that eliminate the shared disk storage
limitation of clustering.. Thanks.Using SQL 2000
Posting to groups again..
Can someone give me a list of outside vendors that help support High
Availability of SQL across geographically dispersed locations. I know
Veritas, NSI, EMC have some solutions that eliminate the shared disk storage
limitation of clustering.. Thanks.Using SQL 2000
"Hassan" <fatima_ja@.hotmail.com> wrote in message news:...
> Can someone give me a list of outside vendors that help support High
> Availability of SQL across geographically dispersed locations. I know
> Veritas, NSI, EMC have some solutions that eliminate the shared disk
storage
> limitation of clustering.. Thanks.Using SQL 2000
>
|||I think Hitachi does as well.
Hilary Cotter
Looking for a book on SQL Server replication?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
"Hassan" <fatima_ja@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23XZ9R6faEHA.2516@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Posting to groups again..
> Can someone give me a list of outside vendors that help support High
> Availability of SQL across geographically dispersed locations. I know
> Veritas, NSI, EMC have some solutions that eliminate the shared disk
storage
> limitation of clustering.. Thanks.Using SQL 2000
>
> "Hassan" <fatima_ja@.hotmail.com> wrote in message news:...
> storage
>
|||if you go with hardware (EMC or Hitachi), you are usually going with
"synchronous" which will raise the ongoing cost of the solution in bandwidth
and limit the maximum distance apart that the nodes can be.
if you go with NSI, you can go any distance since its asynchronous and as a
software-only soluton, you wont have to buy to expensive Symetrix boxes and
SRDF.
jason
"Hassan" <fatima_ja@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23XZ9R6faEHA.2516@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Posting to groups again..
> Can someone give me a list of outside vendors that help support High
> Availability of SQL across geographically dispersed locations. I know
> Veritas, NSI, EMC have some solutions that eliminate the shared disk
storage
> limitation of clustering.. Thanks.Using SQL 2000
>
> "Hassan" <fatima_ja@.hotmail.com> wrote in message news:...
> storage
>
|||...though you would risk lose Microsoft support for your cluster by doing
so.
Regards,
John
"Jason Buffington" <jasonbuffington@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23$I4sjGdEHA.2520@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> if you go with hardware (EMC or Hitachi), you are usually going with
> "synchronous" which will raise the ongoing cost of the solution in
bandwidth
> and limit the maximum distance apart that the nodes can be.
> if you go with NSI, you can go any distance since its asynchronous and as
a
> software-only soluton, you wont have to buy to expensive Symetrix boxes
and
> SRDF.
> jason
>
> "Hassan" <fatima_ja@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:%23XZ9R6faEHA.2516@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> storage
>
Friday, March 9, 2012
High Availability across different sites
Labels:
across,
availability,
database,
dispersed,
geographically,
highavailability,
knowveritas,
locations,
microsoft,
mysql,
oracle,
outside,
server,
sql,
vendors
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment